PUBLICATIONS
Publications
Publications

A Publication of Pepper Hamilton LLP

Tax Alert

Construction Is Complete on Much of the Repair Regulations

Friday, September 13, 2013

On September 13, 2013, the IRS and Treasury Department released final regulations regarding the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property. Rules were also released regarding accounting for and retirement of depreciable property, which were issued as final regulations under Sections 167 and 168. A notice of proposed rulemaking was issued with respect to general asset accounts and the disposition of property. The package is collectively referred to as the “2013 Regulations.”

The 2013 Regulations affect all taxpayers that acquire, produce, or improve tangible property (e.g., plants, buildings, equipment and machinery). Some of the most significant issues enumerated in the regulations involve the treatment of repair expenses associated with tangible property, which is why they are referred to as the “repair regulations.” The rules have very broad application and most corporate taxpayers are affected by these regulations. The Preamble correctly notes that the final regulations clarify and expand the standards in earlier guidance.

In general, these final regulations apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. However, certain rules apply only to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The final regulations provide that a change to comply with the final rules is a change in method of accounting and generally, a Section 481(a) adjustment is required for accounting method changes made to comply with the new regulations. Separate procedures will be issued to provide automatic consent for accounting method changes to comply with the final regulations.

By way of background, these rules reflect a long history. In late December 2011, the Service published regulations addressing the tax treatment of the amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible property (the 2011 Regulations). The 2011 Regulations represented significant modifications to earlier proposed regulations.1 The 2013 Regulations reflect an update to earlier guidance, and they were largely released in a final form. However, because proposed regulations were also released, it is clear that the government will continue to focus on addressing issues associated with tangible property.

Highlights of the Final Regulations

According to the accompanying Preamble, the 2013 Regulations clarify and expand standards in the current regulations under Sections 162(a) and 263(a), expounding certain bright-line tests (e.g., a de minimis rule for certain acquisitions, a safe harbor for routine maintenance for buildings, etc.), and aim to facilitate application of the rules. Further, the 2013 Regulations set forth enhanced guidance regarding elections under the general asset account rules and provide guidance regarding accounting for, and dispositions of, certain depreciable property subject to Section 168:

  • The de minimis safe harbor ceiling has been eliminated and amounts properly expensed under a taxpayer’s financial accounting policies may now be expensed for tax purposes. The safe harbor election is made on an annual basis. 

  • The final regulations continue to provide that repair costs may be deductible, notwithstanding a general plan of rehabilitation. In this regard, however, repair costs may be capitalized under the principles of Section 263A. 

  • Recovery of depreciable property is allowed for property that has been disposed of, as long as the adjusted basis of the asset has been taken into account for realization purposes. 

  • The 2011 Regulations included a routine maintenance safe harbor for equipment; the 2013 Regulations expand earlier guidance and provide a routine maintenance safe harbor for buildings. 

  • The final regulations soften somewhat the provisions in the 2011 Regulations regarding casualty losses. Although it was determined that the government lacked the authority to allow an election to forgo a casualty loss, the rules allow a deduction in certain circumstances for amounts spent in excess of the property damaged in a casualty event. 

  • Additional examples are included regarding adapting property to a new or different use. 

  • The final regulations fail to provide bright-line guidance about when replacement of a major component or substantial structural part has to be capitalized. However, to clarify application, the rules do define both terms, “major component,” and “structural part” of a unit of property.

Other changes may be less well received by taxpayers and practitioners:

  • To clarify the types of activities that constitute a betterment, the final regulations provide that capitalization is required not when an activity results in a betterment but when “it is reasonably expected” to result in one. 

  • The rules fail to provide an objective or bright-line standard for material additions. 

  • With respect to betterments, the final regulations retain the 2011 Regulations’ standard that a betterment is determined by comparing the property immediately after the expenditure with the condition prior to the condition necessitating the repair. The final regulations also clarify that this rule applies when the event necessitating repair is normal wear and tear. However, the regulations specify that this standard does not include wear, tear, or damage that occurs prior to the taxpayer’s acquisition of the property. 

  • The 2011 Regulations provided that the replacement of a “major component” or a “substantial structural part” of an item of property would result in capitalization as a restoration. However, these terms were unclear. The 2013 Regulations include specific definitions of the terms to assist taxpayers in evaluating whether a restoration has occurred. Although definitive terms are appreciated, a preliminary review of the regulatory provisions leads to the observation that they add complexity. The Preamble suggests that the changes to the final regulations will simplify these determinations for building owners. In particular, the Preamble points out that the addition of a routine safe harbor for buildings, modifications to the Section 168 disposition regulations, as well as the addition of many examples “should relieve much of the controversy in determining whether the replacement is of a major component or a significant structural part of a unit of property.”

Highlights of the Rules Regarding Dispositions

With respect to dispositions of tangible depreciable property, the new guidance reflects significant changes, and for this reason the rules were released largely in proposed form. Several commenters suggested that the use of general asset accounts be the default rule regarding asset disposition. It was suggested that requiring taxpayers to make a general asset account election when structural components are placed in service to then forgo the loss on dispositions for structural components occurring years later creates complexity. Although the government acknowledged the benefit of enhanced flexibility of making general asset accounts the default, they did not adopt these suggestions. Instead, significant changes were made to the disposition rules in an effort to provide taxpayers with enhanced flexibility regarding dispositions.

For example, the proposed regulations specify that the asset for disposition purposes is a building, condominium, or a cooperative, rather than individual structural components. The proposed regulations also provide that the disposition rules apply to a partial disposition of an asset (for example, the disposition of a roof), which allows taxpayers to claim a loss upon the disposition of a structural component without identifying the component as an asset before the disposition event occurs.

The partial disposition election is made on a taxpayer’s return for the taxable year in which the portion of the asset is disposed of. Taxpayers may choose to apply these rules to partial disposition rules in 2012 and 2013. Importantly, this provision may also be used when the Service disallows a repair deduction.

To determine assets included in general asset accounts, the proposed regulations provide that the disposition rules apply to a partial disposition of an asset included in a general asset account. Thus, a disposition as a result of a casualty event under Section 165, a disposition of a portion of an asset for which gain is not recognized in whole or in part under Sections 1031 or 1033, a transfer of a portion of an asset in a transaction described in Section 168(i)(7)(B), a sale of a portion of an asset, or a disposition of a portion of an asset in a disposition includes a disposition of a portion of an asset only if the taxpayer makes the election to terminate the general asset account upon the disposition of all assets.

The Preamble to the proposed regulations notes that commenters requested that one or more specific methodologies be provided for reasonable methods of determining the basis of disposed or converted assets (e.g., replacement cost adjusted for inflation using an objective index, using third-party construction estimating and valuation services, or using relative fair market value of acquired components). Rather than provide the subjective guidance, the proposed regulations provide nonexclusive examples of reasonable methods.

The proposed regulations under also provide that if a taxpayer disposes of a portion of an asset and the partial disposition rule applies, the taxpayer must account for the disposed portion in a single asset account beginning in the taxable year in which the disposition occurs. Also, the proposed regulations provide examples demonstrating the interaction between the disposition rules and the capitalization of tangible property rules.

These regulations are proposed to apply to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The regulations also permit taxpayers to rely on the provisions of the proposed regulations for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, and before the applicability date of the final regulations. The proposed regulations provide that taxpayers may apply the provisions of the final regulations regarding dispositions to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012. The temporary regulations under Sections 1.168(i)-1T and 1.168(i)-8T allow taxpayers to apply the temporary regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2012, but the final regulations will provide that taxpayers may not apply the temporary regulations to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

Pepper Perspective

The final and proposed regulations are long-awaited and a wide range of taxpayers are subject to these new rules. We will be reviewing the new rules thoroughly so that we can offer greater insight and perspective regarding the application of the regulations.

Pepper is hosting a Federal Bar Association lunch program on October 3, 2013 at noon in our Washington, D.C. office. The program will also be available to those outside of Washington via webinar. The program will include government representatives from the Department of Treasury (Scott MacKay and Alexa Claybon), as well as the Internal Revenue Service Office of Chief Counsel (Scott Dinwiddie) and In-House Tax Executives, including Barbara Young, Vice President, Marriott International, Inc.; and Kelvin Ault, Vice President, Vanguard Health Systems. The program will address issues corporations face in implementing the new final and proposed regulations.

Endnote

1 On August 21, 2006, the IRS and Treasury Department proposed amendments to the regulations under Section 263(a) relating to amounts paid to acquire, produce, or improve tangible property. See 71 FR 48590-01. The IRS and Treasury Department received numerous written comments and held a public hearing on December 19, 2006. On March 10, 2008, the IRS and Treasury Department withdrew the previously proposed regulations and proposed new regulations, 73 FR 47 12838-01. The IRS and Treasury Department again received several comment letters and held a public hearing on June 24, 2008.

Ellen McElroy and Clayton Garrett

Written by

Ellen McElroy
Phone: 202.220.1589
Fax: 202.220.1665
mcelroye@pepperlaw.com


Clayton Garrett

Mr. Garrett is a project manager in Pepper's Washington, D.C. office. He is admitted to practice in Alabama; he is not admitted to practice in the District of Columbia (garrettc@pepperlaw.com).

The material in this publication was created as of the date set forth above and is based on laws, court decisions, administrative rulings and congressional materials that existed at that time, and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and the transmission and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Internal Revenue Service rules require that we advise you that the tax advice, if any, contained in this publication was not intended or written to be used by you, and cannot be used by you, for the purposes of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

View the PDF version


Copyright © 2014 Pepper Hamilton LLP | Use of This Site Subject to These Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | Contact Us: phinfo@pepperlaw.com or 866.737.7372 | Find Pepper Hamilton LLP on Facebook | Pepper Hamilton LLP on LinkedIn | Follow Pepper Hamilton LLP on Twitter | Pepper Hamilton LLP YouTube Channel