On December 20, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a 231-page package of proposed rules and forms defining who must register as a “municipal advisor” under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. With certain exceptions, the Dodd-Frank Act makes it unlawful for a “municipal advisor” to provide advice to or on behalf of a “municipal entity or obligated person” with respect to municipal financial products or the issuance of municipal securities or to undertake a solicitation of a municipal entity or obligated person unless that municipal advisor is registered in accordance with the act. The universe of persons potentially affected is much broader than originally thought and encompasses a large swath of those providing investment advice to state and local governments and their instrumentalities.
The Dodd Frank Act also expanded the jurisdiction of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) to require registration of “municipal advisors,” using the same definition. These registrations are due December 31, 2010, unless an exemption applies. For example, SEC- registered broker-dealers and SEC-registered investment advisors are exempt from these registration requirements in most instances.
The Dodd-Frank Act defines the term “municipal entity” to include any state, political subdivision of a state, or municipal corporate instrumentality of a state, including agencies and authorities (whether or not they issue municipal bonds). The Dodd-Frank Act further defines the term “municipal advisor” as including any person who provides advice to or on behalf of a municipal entity or obligated person with respect to municipal financial products or the issuance of municipal securities including advice with respect to the structure, timing, terms and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues or who undertakes a solicitation of a municipal entity. It does not include SEC-registered broker-dealers or SEC-registered investment advisors or U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission-registered commodity trading advisors, or attorneys offering legal advice or providing services that are of the traditional legal nature or engineers providing engineering advice. The rule was effective October 1, 2010, meaning anyone who met the definition of a municipal advisor needed to be registered with the SEC at that time.
In September of 2010, the SEC had created a temporary online registration mechanism to allow municipal advisors to register on a temporary basis. These temporary registrations are effective through December 31, 2011.
The SEC’s December 20, 2010 package of proposed rules and forms is designed to give effect to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act referenced above. If adopted, the proposed rules would establish a permanent registration regime with the SEC for municipal advisors and would impose certain record-keeping requirements on such advisors.
There was much uncertainty when the initial interim rule was established in September. The proposed rules have made the picture a bit clearer. According to the SEC’s proposal, there are three principal types of municipal advisors:
The proposal attempts to identify and separate activities that are traditionally performed by a registered advisor under its status as an advisor, for example, and those that are outside such traditional services and that would require a further registration as a municipal advisor. It is also clear that other entities, such as trust companies and persons not required to register with the SEC as advisors, may nevertheless be required to register as “municipal advisors” if they manage money of a state or political subdivision. Accountants who offer traditional accounting services are exempt from registration, as are lawyers who provide primarily legal advice. But should either an accountant or a lawyer be engaged to provide commentary on a feasibility study, for example, it is possible that the provision of these non-traditional services could trigger the registration requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC did clarify in its proposal that with respect to a person providing advice to a pooled investment vehicle (i.e., hedge fund or private equity fund) in which a municipal entity has invested funds along with other investors that are not municipal entities the pooled investment vehicle would not be considered “funds held by or on behalf of a municipal entity” and therefore the person providing the advice to the pooled investment vehicle would not have to register as a municipal advisor (see text accompanying footnote 98 to the SEC Release No. 34-63576A) merely because of this relationship.
The proposed registration Form MA is very similar to a traditional Form ADV, although there are differences.
The municipal advisor registration requirement under the Dodd-Frank Act is a potential “trap for the unwary.” The names of the registrants are publicly available at https://tts.sec.gov/MATR/index.html and one can see that there has been a flurry of registrations even after the October 1 deadline.
Note also that the SEC’s registration requirements are in addition to those required by the MSRB. The MSRB has reminded municipal securities dealers and municipal advisors (as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act) that they must also register with the MSRB and that such registration is in addition to the new SEC “municipal advisor” registration requirements. The MSRB registration is done after the SEC registration is in place (you need the SEC number to complete the MSRB Form G-40 – a short online form). The MSRB registration is due to be filed before January 1, 2011 and there is a an initial filing fee of $100 and an annual fee of $500 (all $600 is due at the time of filing and is mailed to the MSRB’s post office box).
Pepper Hamilton will provide a more comprehensive review of the municipal advisor registration proposal in the near future and will also be collecting comments from our clients and friends for submission to the SEC. Comments are due 45 days after the rules are first published in the Federal Register, which at this writing has not yet occurred. Comments likely will be due around February 5, 2011.
More Resources on the Dodd-Frank Act
For additional information, please visit Pepper's Financial Services Reform Resource Center.
The material in this publication was created as of the date set forth above and is based on laws, court decisions, administrative rulings and congressional materials that existed at that time, and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and the transmission and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.